Three of Chicago’s most important civic organizations are urging the City Council and Mayor Brandon Johnson to make major ethics changes designed to keep the public informed and engaged with what the council is considering.
The leaders of the Better Government Association, the Civic Federation and the League of Women Voters of Chicago called for more transparency and better public access in the body in a letter Thursday to Johnson and council Rules Committee chair Ald. Michelle Harris, 8th.
The groups criticized current City Hall leaders for circumventing rules designed to publicize what aldermen are considering and chipping away at public access to meetings in a letter signed by BGA President David Greising, Civic Federation President (and former Chicago Inspector General) Joe Ferguson and League of Women Voters of Chicago President Jane Ruby.
“Under the current process, it is difficult even for groups informed on government practices, such as ours, to remain abreast of legislation moving through City Council — a strong indication that the process is opaque to the general public,” the letter said.
The letter called for a host of reforms to require the council to share agendas that accurately reflect what aldermen will vote on and debate. State law and city ordinance requires the city to share agendas for council meetings 48 hours ahead of time.
However, such rules are often flouted through parliamentary maneuvers and the use of late substitutions and direct introductions that substantially alter what aldermen will consider, the letter said.
“Agenda items are far too often introduced to committees without prior public posting of their text and sometimes without even alderpersons having an opportunity to see the text,” the letter said.
The three groups called for the 48-hour window to be expanded to four business days and for the full text of all agenda items to be published. They also called for new restrictions blocking the use of non-technical substitutions and direct introduction in an effort to limit aldermen’s ability to dramatically change what is debated during meetings.
It remains to be seen whether the groups’ letter spurs any changes. Aldermen have long resisted adjustments to the way they do business, and Johnson has so far shown little appetite to try to force council reform.
“Based on the way the City Council and committees operate currently, there is hardly any opportunity for meaningful public participation,” Griesing said in a separate statement.
The letter also criticized formerly planned restrictions on access to the City Council chambers that the groups successfully pushed back against. Johnson announced in early December a new policy curtailing public seating in the chambers, but reversed course after outcry that the restrictions could hurt the openness of public meetings.
“The situation demonstrated the need for organizations like ours to protect public participation in the democratic process. It is the right of every citizen to have equal access to their government,” the letter said.
In an effort to provide better public access to government, the groups called on Johnson and the council to offer more time and a simpler process for people registering to speak at meetings. They also called for the council to consider expanding the amount of time allotted for public comment at meetings and called for better systems to record and share what public speakers say.
A Johnson spokesperson did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
jsheridan@chicagotribune.com