A former Republican nominee for Illinois attorney general, downstate lawyer Thomas DeVore, should have his law license suspended for 60 days for a series of infractions, including having a sexual relationship with a client whom he represented in challenging Gov. JB Pritzker’s COVID-19 restrictions in 2020, a legal disciplinary hearing board has recommended.
DeVore, who became well-known for spearheading legal fights over pandemic mandates before his unsuccessful 2022 run for attorney general, began dating a married Springfield salon owner shortly after sending letters challenging the pandemic mandates to government agencies on her behalf in May 2020, according to an Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission hearing board report issued Monday.
The two began a sexual relationship sometime that June, though the exact date was disputed in testimony before the board at a December 2024 hearing.
DeVore argued the sexual relationship with Riley Craig began after his initial work for Craig ended and before his work representing her in other legal matters began. But the hearing board found evidence showing “an unbroken continuation of his attorney-client relationship,” including DeVore preparing pleadings in Craig’s divorce case filed by a law firm associate.
“The evidence is uncontroverted that (DeVore and Craig) engaged in a consensual sexual relationship, but even consensual sexual activity between an attorney and a client constitutes an impermissible conflict of interest because the attorney’s emotional involvement with the client creates a significant risk that the attorney’s independent professional judgment will be impaired,” the hearing board wrote.
The relationship violated Illinois Supreme Court rules governing conflicts of interest for attorneys, the board found.
The state Supreme Court ultimately has the power to decide whether to impose the hearing board’s recommended suspension or take other disciplinary action.
DeVore, who has remained active in state Republican politics, said Tuesday he doesn’t plan to appeal the board’s recommendation and said he wouldn’t comment further out of respect for the process.
In its report, the board said DeVore showed “genuine remorse for and insights gained from his misconduct” and “total cooperation with this disciplinary proceeding,” adding that “four witnesses, including an attorney and a judge, gave compelling testimony about (his) character for truthfulness and respected reputation in the community.”
The report indicates the ARDC began looking into DeVore’s conduct in 2021, but Craig, at the time, “reported that she was not (his) client when their sexual relationship began.” She also made a similar statement on social media during DeVore’s attorney general campaign a year later, the report said.
While the report noted Craig displayed “an admitted willingness to act in furtherance of her own interests” and “threatened to change her story to the ARDC to cause (DeVore) to lose his law license,” the board nevertheless found there was “clear and convincing evidence” to prove their sexual relationship began after their attorney-client relationship.
The hearing board also found DeVore in 2021 helped Craig launch a hair care product business but failed to put proper legal safeguards in place.
DeVore and Craig entered into an operating agreement and took out $600,000 in loans for the business. However, the hearing board found DeVore was at fault for not informing Craig of her right to retain independent counsel and that Craig never gave “written informed consent to the transaction’s essential terms and the lawyer’s role in the transaction.” Both are safeguards required when a lawyer enters into a business transaction with a client.
That summer, the board noted, DeVore “asked (Craig) to see her branding contract, advised her about her misunderstanding of its meaning and effect, and then took steps to help her achieve her business goals.”
The board wasn’t convinced by DeVore’s “attempt to reframe this interaction as ‘business advice’ from a boyfriend to his girlfriend,” the report said. “A lawyer does not simply change hats between attorney and businessman when giving legal advice on a business matter. He remains bound to his ethical obligations while providing legal services, even if the client also relies on his business expertise.”
The relationship between DeVore and Craig had ended in early 2023, months after he lost the attorney general’s race to incumbent Democrat Kwame Raoul. That spring, the business venture with Craig also was failing.
Their company’s bank was declining to extend its loan without seeing “a substantial business plan,” according to the report.
With the business deteriorating alongside their personal relationship, the pair met in May 2023 to discuss how to address the debt and other company issues.
DeVore testified that at the meeting Craig said “she would cause him to lose his law license by changing her story to the ARDC” about when their relationship began, according to the report. Craig, however, testified that “she only recalled threatening … ‘that if he didn’t stop acting the way he was acting at that time, (she) would make sure people knew (she) was his client first,’” the report says.
In the following days and weeks, Craig made her own complaint to the ARDC and filed for personal bankruptcy to avoid paying the company’s debt, according to her testimony.
The day after Craig filed for bankruptcy, DeVore sent an email to her and a company vendor that was owed $30,000, pointing out the personal bankruptcy case wouldn’t prevent the vendor from collecting its payment from their company.
In the email, which was signed “Attorney at Law” and included his firm’s contact information, DeVore wrote that Craig was “ignorant of pretty much anything; hence, why she was treated like a child with lack of access to the finances,” according to the report, adding that the vendor was “dealing with a petulant child who has no idea what to say or do.”
The hearing board found that by sending the email, DeVore violated a Supreme Court rule prohibiting attorneys “from engaging in conduct, while representing a client, that has no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, burden, or delay a third party” — in this instance, Craig. The board said it was unmoved by DeVore’s “explanation that he took off his lawyer hat while writing this email,” the report says.
DeVore also filed a lawsuit against Craig seeking to dissolve their company and, later, an order of protection petition against her, “asserting harassment, stalking, and interference with his personal liberty” and alleging Craig “falsely accused him on social media and in unsolicited communications” to customers and others “of illegal, unethical, or inappropriate behavior,” the board’s report said.
Because there was a stay in place stemming from Craig’s bankruptcy case, the board found DeVore’s lawsuit violated a rule barring attorneys from bringing frivolous actions, though the board didn’t find enough evidence to prove filing the order of protection violated Supreme Court rules.
DeVore also violated other rules by directly contacting Craig about her bankruptcy case even though she was represented by another attorney by then. He also engaged in conduct that was “prejudicial to the administration of justice,” including taking actions that led the bankruptcy judge to issue sanctions against him, the hearing board said.
