Ukraine got a signed commitment in 1994 to ensure its security '“ but can the US and allies stop Putin's aggression now?

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) Lee Feinstein, Indiana University and Mariana Budjeryn, Harvard Kennedy School (THE CONVERSATION) Russia’s illegal annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula in 2014 was the first change of internationally recognized borders in Europe through military force since World War II. Russia proceeded to instigate and fuel a war in eastern Ukraine that has claimed some 14,000 lives so far. Last year, Russia began massing a force of more than 100,000 troops along Ukraine’s eastern and northern border and in the occupied Crimea, and taking other provocative actions. U.S. President Joe Biden said on Jan. 19, 2022, about Putin: ‘œDo I think he’ll test the West, test the United States and NATO, as significantly as he can? Yes, I think he will.’� Ukraine as an independent state was born from the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union. Its independence came with a complicated Cold War inheritance: the world’s third-largest stockpile of nuclear weapons. Ukraine was one of the three non-Russian former Soviet states, including Belarus and Kazakhstan, that emerged from the Soviet collapse with nuclear weapons on its territory. The U.S., in a burst of diplomatic energy and at a time of unmatched global influence, worked to prevent the unprecedented collapse of a nuclear superpower from leading to history’s largest proliferation of nuclear weapons. This diplomatic activity manifested in security assurances for Ukraine embedded in what has become known as the Budapest Memorandum. With the entrance of Ukraine into the international order as a non-nuclear state, Russia, the U.S. and the U.K. pledged to ‘œrespect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine.’� The memo reaffirmed their obligation to ‘œrefrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine.’� The signatories also reaffirmed their commitment to ‘œseek immediate’� UN Security Council action ‘œto provide assistance to Ukraine ‘» if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression.’� These assurances upheld obligations contained in the U.N. charter and the 1975 Helsinki Final Act. Ukraine, in turn, gave up the nuclear weapons within its borders,sending them to Russia for dismantling. In light of Russia’s annexation of Crimea and its current threat to Ukrainian sovereignty, it’s fair to ask: What is the significance now of the Budapest Memorandum? Ukrainian regrets The memorandum, signed in 1994, is not legally binding. Nonetheless, it embeds and reaffirms the solemn assurances that are the hallmark of the international system. These include respect for state sovereignty, the inviolability of international borders and abstention from the threat or use of force. Ukraine’s decision to give up nuclear weapons signaled its desire to be seen as a member in good standing of the international community, rather than an outlier. The decision was not just symbolic. While Ukraine did not inherit a fully fledged nuclear capacity ‘” Russia still held important parts of the nuclear infrastructure ‘” Ukraine had the necessary technological and industrial ability to close the gaps. Many in Ukraine feel that the country’s 1994 decision to give up its nuclear arms was a mistake. Popular support for nuclear rearmament rose to a historic high of nearly 50% in the wake of Russia’s invasion in 2014. Since then, that view has been supported by some Ukrainian public figures. ‘˜No changing of borders by use of force’